Click here for search results
Direct democracy and resource allocation : experimental evidence from Afghanistan, Volume 1
Author:Beath, Andrew; Christia, Fotini; Enikolopov, Ruben; Country:Afghanistan;
Date Stored:2012/07/16Document Date:2012/07/01
Document Type:Policy Research Working PaperSubTopics:Peri-Urban Communities; Housing & Human Habitats; Parliamentary Government; Social Accountability; Rural Urban Linkages
Language:EnglishRegion:South Asia
Report Number:WPS6133Collection Title:Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 6133Impact Evaluation series ; no. IE 68
Volume No:1  

Summary: Direct democracy is designed to better align public resource allocation decisions with citizen preferences. Using a randomized field experiment in 250 villages across Afghanistan, this paper compares outcomes of secret-ballot referenda with those of consultation meetings, which adhere to customary decision-making practices. Elites are found to exert influence over meeting outcomes, but not over referenda outcomes, which are driven primarily by citizen preferences. Referenda are also found to improve public satisfaction, whereas elite domination of allocation processes has a negative effect. The results indicate that the use of direct democracy in public resource allocation results in more legitimate outcomes than those produced by customary processes.

Official Documents
Official, scanned versions of documents (may include signatures, etc.)
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 26 pagesOfficial version*1.82 (approx.)
TextText version**
How To Order

* The official version is derived from scanning the final, paper copy of the document and is the official,
archived version including all signatures, charts, etc.
** The text version is the OCR text of the final scanned version and is not an accurate representation of the final text.
It is provided solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Permanent URL for this page: