Click here for search results
Emerging trends in WTO dispute settlement : back to the GATT?, Volume 1
Author:Holmes, Peter; Rollo, Jim; Young, Alasdair R.; Country:Uruguay;
Date Stored:2003/10/03Document Date:2003/09/30
Document Type:Policy Research Working PaperSubTopics:Environmental Economics & Policies; Information Technology; Trade and Services; Payment Systems & Infrastructure; Judicial System Reform; Economic Theory & Research; Free Trade
Language:EnglishMajor Sector:(Historic)Sector not applicable
Region:Latin America & CaribbeanReport Number:WPS3133
Sub Sectors:(Historic)Sector not applicableCollection Title:Policy Research working paper series ; no. WPS 3133
Volume No:1  

Summary: As the number of cases in the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system has increased, there has been a greater effort by the academic community to analyze the data for emerging trends. Holmes Rollo, and Young seek to develop this literature using data up to the end of 2002 to ask whether recent trends confirm previously identified patterns and to examine whether there are divergences from the overall pattern according to the type of dispute. They focus on three questions in particular: What explains which countries are most involved in complaints under the dispute settlement understanding? Is there a discernible pattern to which countries win? Is there a difference to these patterns depending on the type of measure at the heart of the complaint? The authors find that: A country's trade share is a pretty robust indicator of its likelihood to be either a complainant or a respondent. The frequently remarked absence of the least developed countries from the dispute settlement system can be explained by their low volume of trade. There is not much, if any, evidence of a bias against developing countries either as complainants or respondents. Regulatory issues are fading as reasons for disputes and trade defense disputes are the rising issue. Complainants overwhelmingly win (88 percent of cases). There is no strong evidence that the rate of completion of cases is biased against newly industrializing countries or traditional less developed countries.

Official Documents
Official, scanned versions of documents (may include signatures, etc.)
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 36 pagesOfficial version*2.52 (approx.)
TextText version**
How To Order
Light-Weight Documents
Lighter (less MB) documents which may or may not be the final, official version
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 30 pagesWPS31330.27

* The official version is derived from scanning the final, paper copy of the document and is the official,
archived version including all signatures, charts, etc.
** The text version is the OCR text of the final scanned version and is not an accurate representation of the final text.
It is provided solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Permanent URL for this page: