Click here for search results
Climate change, conflict, and cooperation : global analysis of the resilience of international river treaties to increased water variability, Volume 1
Author:Dinar, Shlomi; Katz, David; De Stefano, Lucia; Blankespoor, Brian; Country:World;
Date Stored:2014/06/10Document Date:2014/06/01
Document Type:Policy Research Working PaperSubTopics:Common Property Resource Development; Water and Industry; Town Water Supply and Sanitation; Water Supply and Sanitation Governance and Institutions; Water Supply and Systems
Language:EnglishMajor Sector:Water, sanitation and flood protection
Rel. Proj ID:1W-Climate Change, Conflict And Cooperation -- -- P146657;Region:The World Region
Report Number:WPS6916Sub Sectors:General water, sanitation and flood protection sector
Collection Title:Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 6916Volume No:1

Summary: Although water variability has already been observed across river basins, climate change is predicted to increase variability. Such environmental changes may aggravate political tensions, especially in regions that are not equipped with an appropriate institutional apparatus. Increased variability is also likely to challenge regions with existing institutional capacity. This paper argues that the best attempts to assess the ability of states to deal with variability in the future rest with considering how agreements have fared in the past. The paper investigates to what extent particular mechanisms and institutional designs help mitigate inter-country tensions over shared water. The analysis specifically focuses on identifying which water allocation mechanisms and institutional features provide better opportunities for mitigating conflict given that water allocation issues tend to be most salient among riparians. Water-related events from the Basins at Risk events database are used as the dependent variable to test hypotheses regarding the viability, or resilience, of treaties over time. Climatic, geographic, political, and economic variables are used as controls. The analysis is conducted for the years 1948-2001 with the country dyad as the level of observation. Findings pertaining to the primary explanatory variables suggest that country dyads governed by treaties with water allocation mechanisms exhibiting both flexibility and specificity evince more cooperative behavior. Country dyads governed by treaties with a larger sum of institutional mechanisms likewise evince a higher level of cooperation, although certain institutional mechanisms are more important than others.

Official Documents
Official, scanned versions of documents (may include signatures, etc.)
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 40 pagesOfficial version*2.8 (approx.)
TextText version**
How To Order

See documents related to this project
* The official version is derived from scanning the final, paper copy of the document and is the official,
archived version including all signatures, charts, etc.
** The text version is the OCR text of the final scanned version and is not an accurate representation of the final text.
It is provided solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Permanent URL for this page: