Click here for search results
Improving air quality in metropolitan Mexico City : an economic valuation, Volume 1
 
Author:Cesar, Herman; Borja-Aburto, Victor H.; Dorland, Kees; Munoz Cruz, Roberto; Brander, Luke; Cropper, Maureen; Gonzalez Marinez, Ana Citlalic; Olaiz-Fernandez, Gustavo; Martinez Bolivar, Ana Patricia; Olsthoorn, Xander; Rosales-Castillo, Alberto; Soto Montes de Oca, Gloria; Torres-Meza, Victor; Uribe Ceron, Ricardo; Van Beukering, Pieter; Vega Lopez, Eduardo; Nino Zarazua, Max Magin; Nino Zarazua,Miguel Angel; Vergara, Walter; Country:Mexico;
Date Stored:2002/03/08Document Date:2002/02/28
Document Type:Policy Research Working PaperSubTopics:Transport and Environment; Montreal Protocol; Global Environment Facility; Air Quality & Clean Air; Health Monitoring & Evaluation; Public Health Promotion
Language:EnglishMajor Sector:(Historic)Environment
Region:Latin America & CaribbeanReport Number:WPS2785
Sub Sectors:Pollution Control / Waste ManagementCollection Title:Policy, Research working paper series ; no. WPS 2785
Volume No:1  

Summary: Mexico City has for years experienced high levels of ozone and particulate air pollution. In 1995-99 the entire population of the Mexico City metropolitan area was exposed to annual average concentrations of fine particulate pollution (particulates with a diameter of less than 10 micrometers, or PM10) exceeding 50 micrograms per cubic meter, the annual average standard in both Mexico and the United States. Two million people were exposed to annual average PM10 levels of more than 75 micrograms per cubic meter. The daily maximum one-hour ozone standard was exceeded at least 300 days a year. The Mexico Air Quality Management Team documents population-weighted exposures to ozone and PM10 between 1995 and 1999, project exposures in 2010, and computes the value of four scenarios for 2010: A 10 percent reduction in PM10 and ozone. A 20 percent reduction in PM10 and ozone. Achievement of ambient air quality standards across the metropolitan area. A 68 percent reduction in ozone and a 47 percent reduction in PM10 across the metropolitan area. The authors calculate the health benefits of reducing ozone and PM10 for each scenario using dose-response functions from the peer-reviewed literature. They value cases of morbidity and premature mortality avoided using three approaches: Cost of illness and forgone earnings only (low estimate). Cost of illness, forgone earnings, and willingness to pay for avoided morbidity (central case estimate). Cost of illness, forgone earnings, willingness to pay for avoided morbidity, and willingness to pay for avoided mortality (high estimate). The results suggest that the benefits of a 10 percent reduction in ozone and PM10 in 2010 are about $760 million (in 1999 U.S. dollars) annually in the central case. The benefits of a 20 percent reduction in ozone and PM10 are about $1.49 billion annually. In each case the benefits of reducing ozone amount to about 15 percent of the total benefits. By estimating the magnitude of the benefits from air pollution control, the authors provide motivation for examining specific policies that could achieve the air pollution reductions that they value. They also provide unit values for the benefits from reductions in ambient air pollution (for example, per microgram of PM10) that could be used as inputs into a full cost-benefit analysis of air pollution control strategies.

Official Documents
Official, scanned versions of documents (may include signatures, etc.)
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 62 pagesOfficial version*4.34 (approx.)
TextText version**
How To Order
Light-Weight Documents
Lighter (less MB) documents which may or may not be the final, official version
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 56 pagesWPS27850.63

* The official version is derived from scanning the final, paper copy of the document and is the official,
archived version including all signatures, charts, etc.
** The text version is the OCR text of the final scanned version and is not an accurate representation of the final text.
It is provided solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.



Permanent URL for this page: http://go.worldbank.org/LXJVHF1HJ0