Click here for search results
Corporate diversification in East Asia : the role of ultimate ownership and group affiliation, Volume 1
Author:Claessens, Stijn; Djankov, Simeon; Joseph P. H. Fan; Lang, Larry H. P.; Country:Korea, Republic of; Hong Kong SAR, China; Philippines; Singapore; Japan; Taiwan, China; Indonesia; Thailand; Malaysia;
Date Stored:1999/07/22Document Date:1999/03/31
Document Type:Policy Research Working PaperSubTopics:International Terrorism & Counterterrorism; Small and Medium Size Enterprises; Fiscal & Monetary Policy; Private Participation in Infrastructure; Microfinance; Small Scale Enterprise
Language:EnglishMajor Sector:(Historic)Multisector
Region:East Asia and Pacific; OTHReport Number:WPS2089
Sub Sectors:Non-Sector SpecificCollection Title:Policy, Research working paper ; no. WPS 2089
Volume No:1  

Summary: Using data for more than 2,000 companies from nine East Asian economies, the authors examine the interactions between ultimate ownership, group affiliation, and corporate diversification. They find evidence that allocation resources within business groups is associated with higher market valuation when external markets are less developed. They also find that group affiliation and firm-level diversification are used complementarily to exploit the relative cost-effectiveness of internal markets. They reject the hypothesis that diversification patterns can be explained by large blockholders' incentive to reduce risk. But they find support for the hypothesis that controlling owners use diversification to expropriate other shareholders. Group affiliation is widespread among publicly traded corporations in East Asia. Group-affiliated firms are on average associated with diversification discounts. Further analysis reveals that the discounts are attributable to diversified firms in the more developed East Asian economies. By contrast, group affiliation positively contributes to diversification performance in less developed economies. The authors find that group-affiliated firms are more likely to diversify in developing economies but are equally likely to diversify in developed economies. When diversifying in more developed economies, group-affiliated firms destroy more value than do independent firms. In developing economies, group-affiliated firms are more likely than independent firms to benefit from diversification in developing economies.

Official Documents
Official, scanned versions of documents (may include signatures, etc.)
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 35 pagesOfficial version*2.45 (approx.)
TextText version**
How To Order
Light-Weight Documents
Lighter (less MB) documents which may or may not be the final, official version
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 32 pagesWPS20890.09

* The official version is derived from scanning the final, paper copy of the document and is the official,
archived version including all signatures, charts, etc.
** The text version is the OCR text of the final scanned version and is not an accurate representation of the final text.
It is provided solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Permanent URL for this page: