Click here for search results
Aid quality and donor rankings, Volume 1
 
Author:Knack, Stephen; Rogers, F. Halsey; Eubank, Nicholas; Collection Title:Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5290
Country:World; Date Stored:2012/04/16
Document Date:2010/05/01Document Type:Policy Research Working Paper
SubTopics:Poverty Monitoring & Analysis; Gender and Health; Economic Adjustment and Lending; Disability; Development Economics & Aid EffectivenessLanguage:English
Major Sector:Health and other social servicesRel. Proj ID:1W-Aid And The Mdgs -- -- P096746;
Region:The World RegionReport Number:WPS5290
Sub Sectors:Other social servicesTF No/Name:TF057010-KCP
Volume No:1  

Summary: This paper offers new measures of aid quality covering 38 bilateral and multilateral donors, as well as new insights about the robustness and usefulness of such measures. The 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the follow-up 2008 Accra Agenda for Action have focused attention on common donor practices that reduce the development impact of aid. Using 18 underlying indicators that capture these practices -- derived from the OECD-DAC's Survey for Monitoring the Paris Declaration, the new AidData database, and the DAC aid tables -- the authors construct an overall aid quality index and four coherently defined sub-indexes on aid selectivity, alignment, harmonization, and specialization. Compared with earlier indicators used in donor rankings, this indicator set is more comprehensive and representative of the range of donor practices addressed in the Paris Declaration, improving the validity, reliability, and robustness of rankings. One of the innovations is to increase the validity of the aid quality indicators by adjusting for recipient characteristics, donor aid volumes, and other factors. Despite these improvements in data and methodology, the authors caution against overinterpretation on overall indexes such as these. Alternative plausible assumptions regarding weights or the inclusion of additional indicators can still produce marked shifts in the ranking of some donors, so that small differences in overall rankings are not meaningful. Moreover, because the performance of some donors varies considerably across the four sub-indexes, these sub-indexes may be more useful than the overall index in identifying donors’ relative strengths and weaknesses.

Official Documents
Official, scanned versions of documents (may include signatures, etc.)
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 35 pagesOfficial version*2.45 (approx.)
TextText version**
How To Order

See documents related to this project
* The official version is derived from scanning the final, paper copy of the document and is the official,
archived version including all signatures, charts, etc.
** The text version is the OCR text of the final scanned version and is not an accurate representation of the final text.
It is provided solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.



Permanent URL for this page: http://go.worldbank.org/G16OUYAJ00