Click here for search results
School inputs, household substitution, and test scores, Volume 1
Author:Das, Jishnu; Dercon, Stefan; Habyarimana, James; Krishnan, Pramila; Muralidharan, Karthik; Sundararaman, Venkatesh; Country:World;
Date Stored:2011/04/08Document Date:2011/04/01
Document Type:Policy Research Working PaperSubTopics:Tertiary Education; Education For All; Access to Finance; Teaching and Learning; Disability
Language:EnglishMajor Sector:Public Administration; Education
Rel. Proj ID:1W-Qsds Service Delivery -- -- P070007;Region:The World Region
Report Number:WPS5629Sub Sectors:Other Public Administration; Primary Education
Collection Title:Impact Evaluation series ; no. IE 49Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5629Paper is funded by the Knowledge for Change Program (KCP)TF No/Name:TF026542-PHRD-PHILIPPINES:; TF040606-WORLD:; TF040917-RUSSIA:; TF041078-WORLD- HEALTH AND SOCIAL PROTECTION POLICIES; TF050207-BNPP-CAPACITY/BUILD:DECENTRALIZATION-GOVERNANCE; TF050450-NTF; TF051762-KCP-USER; TF051764-KCP-INCENTIVES,; TF052376-KCP-EVALUATING
Volume No:1  

Summary: Empirical studies of the relationship between school inputs and test scores typically do not account for the fact that households will respond to changes in school inputs. This paper presents a dynamic household optimization model relating test scores to school and household inputs, and tests its predictions in two very different low-income country settings -- Zambia and India. The authors measure household spending changes and student test score gains in response to unanticipated as well as anticipated changes in school funding. Consistent with the optimization model, they find in both settings that households offset anticipated grants more than unanticipated grants. They also find that unanticipated school grants lead to significant improvements in student test scores but anticipated grants have no impact on test scores. The results suggest that naïve estimates of public education spending on learning outcomes that do not account for optimal household responses are likely to be considerably biased if used to estimate parameters of an education production function.

Official Documents
Official, scanned versions of documents (may include signatures, etc.)
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 44 pagesOfficial version*3.08 (approx.)
TextText version**
How To Order

See documents related to this project
* The official version is derived from scanning the final, paper copy of the document and is the official,
archived version including all signatures, charts, etc.
** The text version is the OCR text of the final scanned version and is not an accurate representation of the final text.
It is provided solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Permanent URL for this page:

© 2016 The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved. Legal