Click here for search results
Market access bargaining in the Uruguay Round - Rigid or relaxed reciprocity?, Volume 1
 
Author:Finger, J. Michael; Reincke, Ulrich; Castro, Adriana; Collection Title:Policy, Research working paper ; no. WPS 2258
Date Stored:2001/04/25Document Date:1999/12/31
Document Type:Policy Research Working PaperLanguage:English
Major Sector:(Historic)Economic PolicyReport Number:WPS2258
Sub Sectors:TradeSubTopics:Rules of Origin; Environmental Economics & Policies; Export Competitiveness; Economic Theory & Research; Trade Policy; Free Trade; Trade and Regional Integration
Volume No:1  

Summary: How tightly are trade negotiators held to winning a dollar of concession for each dollar of concession granted? The outcome of the Uruguay Round tariff negotiations suggests that such constraints were not tight. None of the delegations interviewed by the authors had tried to calculate for themselves the extent of concessions "received" And the surplus or deficit of concessions received (over concessions given) varied widely among countries. Measuring the "percentage point dollar" of concessions given and received (a "percentage point dollar" being a reduction of the tariff by one percentage point on $1 of imports, or by trading partners on exports), they found that the outcome of negotiations varied enormously from one country to another. For 13 of 27 countries, "net concessions" (positive or negative) were at least 75 percent of the size of concessions received. Negotiations were widely perceived to involve "equal sacrifice for the common good," with all countries expected to cut tariffs on the same percentage of imports. Ability to pay was also a consideration: a smaller fraction of imports was liberalized for developing countries. The authors found a tendency toward equality (in percentage of imports affected) across participating countries' concessions, particularly when developing countries' unilateral liberalization was considered - including the part of it that was not bound at the Uruguay Round. Delegations emphasized how important it was for them to look after the interests of politically important sectors (including rice for Japan and the Republic of Korea and textiles for the United States and the European Union).

Official Documents
Official, scanned versions of documents (may include signatures, etc.)
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 30 pagesOfficial version*2.1 (approx.)
TextText version**
How To Order
Light-Weight Documents
Lighter (less MB) documents which may or may not be the final, official version
File TypeDescriptionFile Size (mb)
PDF 26 pagesWPS22580.07

* The official version is derived from scanning the final, paper copy of the document and is the official,
archived version including all signatures, charts, etc.
** The text version is the OCR text of the final scanned version and is not an accurate representation of the final text.
It is provided solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.



Permanent URL for this page: http://go.worldbank.org/A49GE4NDW0